<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>平台数据 on 南京大学新闻创新实验室 · 论文速递</title><link>https://nju-journalism-lab.pages.dev/tags/%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE/</link><description>Recent content in 平台数据 on 南京大学新闻创新实验室 · 论文速递</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nju-journalism-lab.pages.dev/tags/%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Price, proficiency, or permission: assessing platform data access for election research</title><link>https://nju-journalism-lab.pages.dev/posts/2026-05-29/information-communication-society/platform-data-access-election-research/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://nju-journalism-lab.pages.dev/posts/2026-05-29/information-communication-society/platform-data-access-election-research/</guid><description>系统梳理 738 项选举研究使用社交媒体数据的方式，揭示数据获取日益依赖于财力、技术和平台关系三重门槛，并呼吁建立支持多元研究群体获取数据的政策框架。</description></item></channel></rss>